E85Performance.net - Discussion Forum for All E85 Car Owners  
Go Back   E85Performance.net - Discussion Forum for All E85 Car Owners > Engines and Tech > E85 N/A Horsepower
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

E85 N/A Horsepower Naturally aspirated performance discussion.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-03-2010, 04:01 PM   #1
BLUEBOY455
Member
 
BLUEBOY455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver wa
Posts: 41
E-97 or 100

What is best, mix up my own e-85 or just run E-97. And if running E-97 is good what would fuel to air mix be best to start out at. Finely found E-97 so I can have a consistant fuel at the track evey time.
BLUEBOY455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2010, 07:35 PM   #2
Drag Chevette
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLUEBOY455 View Post
What is best, mix up my own e-85 or just run E-97. And if running E-97 is good what would fuel to air mix be best to start out at. Finely found E-97 so I can have a consistant fuel at the track evey time.

IF you can get the E97 I would blend it with 93 octane unleaded and mix it to 85-87%.

dont have time to get into much detail right now, but can tell you that they put that much gasoline in it for a reason.....

If you need a good quality tester, let me know.
Drag Chevette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 12:41 AM   #3
BLUEBOY455
Member
 
BLUEBOY455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver wa
Posts: 41
A tester would be good for me I plan on getting into this a lot deeper in time. Baby steps first, trying to learn as much I can on ethanol and tuninig for it. Got a long way to go though.
BLUEBOY455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 11:09 AM   #4
Thumpin455
Junior Member
 
Thumpin455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Michigan's U.P.
Posts: 28
Why not run the 97 and just forgo adding gas? If you have cold start problems then you could add some, but if its a race car or blown, why not just run it the way you get it?
Thumpin455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 09:17 PM   #5
Drag Chevette
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thumpin455 View Post
Why not run the 97 and just forgo adding gas? If you have cold start problems then you could add some, but if its a race car or blown, why not just run it the way you get it?
E97 is extreemly hard to light and you need a super high powered ignition to get complete burn cycle.

E97 in pure for has a thick viscosity and the flow is hard to stay mixed in a non injected car.

E97 will be more corrosive than E85 as it does not have the gasoline to nuetralize the acid produced by the rejected water.

E85 -E87 can make more power on the dyno than E97
Drag Chevette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 11:00 PM   #6
BLUEBOY455
Member
 
BLUEBOY455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: vancouver wa
Posts: 41
That is the kind of info that I am looking for. I am trying to get my stock long block car at full wieght to 11.5x ETs this season. Being able now to mix my ethanol % to what is best should help. Also now I have total tuning capabilitys for ECM, I was hoping you smart guys may give enough hints to help.
BLUEBOY455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 12:18 AM   #7
alcohol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 232
Mark I completely agree with your comments except I wonder about this one;

"E97 will be more corrosive than E85 as it does not have the gasoline to nuetralize the acid produced by the rejected water"

How will gas neutralize acids?
Gasoline also contains some sulfur of which some will end up a sulfuric acid during combustion.
The flip side of my comments is that I have had our lab folks comment that E100 will hydrate much faster in open air than E98 due to the denaturant- It MAY be possible that even more gas COULD slow the hydration more- but that would only be theory on my part.

Your comment may be correct but I cannot connect the dots.

Last edited by alcohol; 03-05-2010 at 12:26 AM.
alcohol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 07:00 AM   #8
Drag Chevette
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by alcohol View Post
Mark I completely agree with your comments except I wonder about this one;

"E97 will be more corrosive than E85 as it does not have the gasoline to nuetralize the acid produced by the rejected water"

How will gas neutralize acids?
Gasoline also contains some sulfur of which some will end up a sulfuric acid during combustion.
The flip side of my comments is that I have had our lab folks comment that E100 will hydrate much faster in open air than E98 due to the denaturant- It MAY be possible that even more gas COULD slow the hydration more- but that would only be theory on my part.

Your comment may be correct but I cannot connect the dots.
you would know more than I, but as you stated, I too have found is that E97 will hydrate faster and slightly more than e85 and somehow the water content/rejection the corrosiveness is more visable.
after a brief discussion with another fuel guy we could only come up with the gasoline is a by product of crude, and the oil contents may play a part in the protection of the parts by nuetralizing the mix somehow.

, your the fuel expert. im just a E85 carb builder....lol
Drag Chevette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-2010, 01:55 PM   #9
alcohol
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drag Chevette View Post
you would know more than I, but as you stated, I too have found is that E97 will hydrate faster and slightly more than e85 and somehow the water content/rejection the corrosiveness is more visable.
after a brief discussion with another fuel guy we could only come up with the gasoline is a by product of crude, and the oil contents may play a part in the protection of the parts by nuetralizing the mix somehow.

, your the fuel expert. im just a E85 carb builder....lol
And a darn good carb builder at that !

IF indeed the higher level of gas slows down hydration as we have theorized, then this would slow/prevent formation of formic and/or acetic acids- thus if this is the acid source then E85 would have a lower rate of acidification in the fuel but- the sulfuric acid formation would be potentially higher.

It could also be that the E98- E100 that folks sometimes get has "missed" the ph balance and corrosion inhibitor steps that large shipment fuel grade E98 always gets due to federal and terminal specifications- that would make the largest difference of all.
alcohol is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
2008 E85Performance.net